Report Comments
Student evaluations of teaching provide critical feedback to instructors that can be used to adjust
and improve the class experience.
This information is also evaluated as part of performance reviews.
You are encouraged to review this information to learn more about the student perspective and experience.
If you have any questions about the process or how to interpret this information, please contact the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Planning at oiepset@gmu.edu.
and improve the class experience.
This information is also evaluated as part of performance reviews.
You are encouraged to review this information to learn more about the student perspective and experience.
If you have any questions about the process or how to interpret this information, please contact the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Planning at oiepset@gmu.edu.
- Creation Date
- Thursday, December 19, 2024
| Raters | Students |
|---|---|
| Responded | 11 |
| Invited | 39 |
| Response Ratio | 28.21% |
| Competency | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course | Standard Deviation | Min | Max | |
| I completed all assigned tasks before each class. | 4.36 | +/-0.67 | 3.00 | 5.00 |
| I consistently contributed to class activities/discussions. | 4.45 | +/-0.69 | 3.00 | 5.00 |
| I gained an understanding of the main concepts in this course. | 4.09 | +/-1.22 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
| I learned through the variety of learning opportunities (e.g. assignments, projects, papers, discussions, group work, peer review, exams) provided. | 4.18 | +/-1.17 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
| I found the instructor's feedback helpful for learning. | 3.82 | +/-1.33 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
| I learned due to the instructor's teaching methods/style. | 3.91 | +/-1.38 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
| The instructor created an environment that facilitated my engagement with course content. | 4.09 | +/-1.22 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
| The instructor encouraged expression of diverse perspectives. | 3.91 | +/-1.22 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
| The instructor offered opportunities for students to provide feedback on the course. | 3.82 | +/-1.25 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
| The instructor offered opportunities to meet outside of class time, such as virtual or in-person office hours. | 4.18 | +/-0.75 | 3.00 | 5.00 |
| The instructor used technologies and/or resources/tools that increased my engagement with course content. | 3.91 | +/-1.22 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
| The course organization supported my learning. | 3.73 | +/-1.49 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
| The instructor clearly communicated course requirements to students. | 3.82 | +/-1.17 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
| The instructor clearly presented the course content. | 3.82 | +/-1.17 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
Student Participation Q7-Q8
| Competency Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Mean | 4.41 |
1. I completed all assigned tasks before each class.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 4.36 |
| Median | 4.00 |
2. I consistently contributed to class activities/discussions.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 4.45 |
| Median | 5.00 |
Learning Outcomes Q9-Q12
| Competency Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Mean | 4.00 |
1. I gained an understanding of the main concepts in this course.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 4.09 |
| Median | 4.00 |
2. I learned through the variety of learning opportunities (e.g. assignments, projects, papers, discussions, group work, peer review, exams) provided.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 4.18 |
| Median | 4.00 |
3. I found the instructor's feedback helpful for learning.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 3.82 |
| Median | 4.00 |
4. I learned due to the instructor's teaching methods/style.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 3.91 |
| Median | 4.00 |
Course Environment/Experiences Q13-Q17
| Competency Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Mean | 3.98 |
1. The instructor created an environment that facilitated my engagement with course content.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 4.09 |
| Median | 4.00 |
2. The instructor encouraged expression of diverse perspectives.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 3.91 |
| Median | 4.00 |
3. The instructor offered opportunities for students to provide feedback on the course.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 3.82 |
| Median | 4.00 |
4. The instructor offered opportunities to meet outside of class time, such as virtual or in-person office hours.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 4.18 |
| Median | 4.00 |
5. The instructor used technologies and/or resources/tools that increased my engagement with course content.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 3.91 |
| Median | 4.00 |
Instructor Preparation and Course Organization Q18-Q20
| Competency Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Mean | 3.79 |
1. The course organization supported my learning.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 3.73 |
| Median | 4.00 |
2. The instructor clearly communicated course requirements to students.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 3.82 |
| Median | 4.00 |
3. The instructor clearly presented the course content.
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
| Mean | 3.82 |
| Median | 4.00 |
Were there any significant obstacles to learning that were beyond the control of the instructor (e.g., scheduling or technology problems, university closings, limitations caused by other students or by group dynamics)? If so, please explain.
| Comments |
|---|
| The project managers assigned in the class failed to communicate the expected deliverables and timeframes clearly. The due dates set by the project managers were sometimes within the same week, creating significant stress and confusion. Additionally, conflicting information was provided regarding the projects, which could have negatively affected the grade. This conflicting information contradicted what was communicated by the instructor. |
| nothing |
| no obstacles |
| no |
| Nothing. |
| No , they are None |
What 2-3 aspects of this course were most valuable to your learning experience?
| Comments |
|---|
| The course provided me hands–on experience with cutting–edge projects. |
| We had projects which are very useful in future and had a great experience with it. |
| linkedin upgrade working in all of us research workbench |
| Through the projects we did we learned how to work on the real life data |
| The projects we worked on in this course were really good and I absolutely loved it. |
| I appreciate this course and Projects are Really helpful for the students for better understanding the future work. |
What 2-3 aspects of this course were least valuable to your learning experience?
| Comments |
|---|
| The assignment due dates, midterm submission due dates, and final submission due dates were not communicated clearly and new submissions were created spontaneously within the same week. The course content and course schedule was not clearly explained and created overwhelming stress throughout the semester. |
| nothing |
| nothing |
| Nothing. |
| None |
What modifications do you suggest for the next time the course is taught?
| Comments |
|---|
| A structured course content and syllabus with due dates assigned and expected submissions detailed at the beginning of the semester would be extremely helpful. Explanation of the main concepts. |
| Nothing much |
| No modifications required. It's a great workshop! |
| I feel like we need to get more assistance and time in completing the projects |
| Nothing, it was good. |
| Professor and teaching assistants are really good in what they are trying to convey and deliver the subjects .I don't find any extra Modifications required for the course. |
Student Information
What is your class level?
What is your class level?
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
For your plan of study, this course is:
For your plan of study, this course is:
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
What is the class format/delivery?
What is the class format/delivery?
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
How many times were you absent from class sessions?
How many times were you absent from class sessions?
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 10 |
On average, how many hours per week outside of class did you spend preparing for this class?
On average, how many hours per week outside of class did you spend preparing for this class?
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 11 |
What grade do you expect in this course?
What grade do you expect in this course?
| Statistics | Value |
|---|---|
| Response Count | 10 |
Student Evaluations of Teaching (Q7-Q20) - Chart
1. I completed all assigned tasks before each class.
2. I consistently contributed to class activities/discussions.
3. I gained an understanding of the main concepts in this course.
4. I learned through the variety of learning opportunities (e.g. assignments, projects, papers, discussions, group work, peer review, exams) provided.
5. I found the instructor's feedback helpful for learning.
6. I learned due to the instructor's teaching methods/style.
7. The instructor created an environment that facilitated my engagement with course content.
8. The instructor encouraged expression of diverse perspectives.
9. The instructor offered opportunities for students to provide feedback on the course.
10. The instructor offered opportunities to meet outside of class time, such as virtual or in-person office hours.
11. The instructor used technologies and/or resources/tools that increased my engagement with course content.
12. The course organization supported my learning.
13. The instructor clearly communicated course requirements to students.
14. The instructor clearly presented the course content.
Student Evaluations of Teaching (Q7-Q20)
| Mean | Median | Min | Max | Resp | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I completed all assigned tasks before each class. | 4.36 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 11 | |
| I consistently contributed to class activities/discussions. | 4.45 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 11 | |
| I gained an understanding of the main concepts in this course. | 4.09 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 11 | |
| I learned through the variety of learning opportunities (e.g. assignments, projects, papers, discussions, group work, peer review, exams) provided. | 4.18 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 11 | |
| I found the instructor's feedback helpful for learning. | 3.82 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 11 | |
| I learned due to the instructor's teaching methods/style. | 3.91 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 11 | |
| The instructor created an environment that facilitated my engagement with course content. | 4.09 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 11 | |
| The instructor encouraged expression of diverse perspectives. | 3.91 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 11 | |
| The instructor offered opportunities for students to provide feedback on the course. | 3.82 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 11 | |
| The instructor offered opportunities to meet outside of class time, such as virtual or in-person office hours. | 4.18 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 11 | |
| The instructor used technologies and/or resources/tools that increased my engagement with course content. | 3.91 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 11 | |
| The course organization supported my learning. | 3.73 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 11 | |
| The instructor clearly communicated course requirements to students. | 3.82 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 11 | |
| The instructor clearly presented the course content. | 3.82 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 11 |